CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Under a share-transfer scheme, Ashoka Holdings Ltd (transferee) has obtained the required approval from the shareholders of Bharat Dyes Ltd. On 10 September it gives notice to a dissenting shareholder, Mr Iyer, that it wishes to acquire his shares under Section 235. By what date must Mr Iyer apply to the Tribunal if he wants to resist the acquisition?
Mr Iyer must apply to the Tribunal within one month from the date the notice was given, so by 10 October. If he does not, and the Tribunal does not order otherwise, the transferee company is entitled and bound to acquire his shares on the scheme terms.
- A10 October, being within one month from the date of noticeCorrect
- B10 November, being within two months from the date of notice
- C10 December, being within four months from the date of notice
- D10 September of the next year, being within one year
Explanation
Section 235(2) makes the transferee bound to acquire the shares unless the dissenting shareholder applies to the Tribunal within one month from the date the notice was given and the Tribunal orders otherwise. Notice was given on 10 September, so the application must be made by 10 October. The two-month and four-month periods in the section relate to other steps.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- Mehta Textiles Ltd's advisor drafts a note stating that a scheme of revival and rehabilitation of a sick company will be sanctioned by the T…
- A student preparing a note on the Companies Act, 2013 claims that a Rehabilitation and Insolvency Fund under Section 269 can finance the rev…
- Gangotri Steels Ltd's board proposes to approach the Tribunal for sanction of a revival scheme and wants the sanctioned scheme to bind all c…
- Godavari Steels Ltd's sanctioned arrangement is only partly workable, but the company can still pay its debts as per the scheme. Can the Tri…
- After the Tribunal sanctioned the arrangement of Narmada Agro Ltd, it appointed no one to monitor progress. Which statement about the Tribun…
- Bharat Polymers Ltd's arrangement was sanctioned, but the Tribunal is satisfied that it cannot be implemented satisfactorily even with modif…