ACCA Applied Skills · Performance Management · Activity-based costing
Which of the following is a typical reason for grouping several activities into a single cost pool in an ABC system?
Activities should be grouped into one cost pool when they share the same cost driver, because one rate per driver unit can then fairly absorb all their costs. Location, cost behaviour or product are not valid pooling criteria.
- AThe activities all have the same cost driverCorrect
- BThe activities are all carried out in the same department
- CThe activities all have fixed costs
- DThe activities relate to the same product
Explanation
Costs of different activities can be pooled where they are driven by the same cost driver, since a single rate then applies to all of them. Being in the same department, being fixed, or relating to one product does not by itself justify pooling.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Activity-based costing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Activity-based costing questions
- Setup costs at Delta Co total $120,000 for the period, and the cost driver is the number of machine setups. There were 400 setups in total. …
- Kiln Co makes products P and Q. Overheads are: material handling $92,000 (driver: production batches) and inspection $70,000 (driver: inspec…
- Kora Co absorbs overheads using machine hours. Product X uses 2 machine hours per unit and Product Y uses 1 hour per unit. The overhead rate…
- Compared with a traditional absorption costing system that uses a single direct labour hour rate, what is the usual effect of switching to a…
- Bell Co makes products X and Y. Overheads are: machining $90,000 (driver: machine hours) and setups $60,000 (driver: number of setups). Tota…
- Which of the following is a recognised criticism of traditional volume-based absorption costing?