ACCA Applied Skills · Performance Management · Divisional performance and transfer pricing
Which of the following is the main behavioural benefit of assessing divisional managers only on controllable costs and profit?
Assessing managers only on controllable items is likely to be seen as fair and so supports motivation. It does not guarantee goal congruence, and it does not replace separate assessment of the division's overall profitability, which includes non-controllable traceable costs.
- AIt ensures all head office costs are recovered by divisions
- BIt is likely to be seen as fair and keeps managers motivatedCorrect
- CIt removes the need for any assessment of the division's own performance
- DIt guarantees goal congruence with group objectives
Explanation
Holding managers accountable only for what they can influence is perceived as fair and supports motivation. It does not guarantee goal congruence, and the division itself should still be assessed using a wider measure including traceable non-controllable costs.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Divisional performance and transfer pricing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Divisional performance and transfer pricing questions
- Division Alpha has capital employed of $800,000 and annual controllable profit of $140,000. The group cost of capital is 15%. A new project …
- Division Beta's manager is appraised on residual income. Head office decides to charge the division $40,000 for a new group IT system the ma…
- Division Gamma has capital employed of $1,200,000 and divisional profit of $216,000. The group requires a return of 14%. Which is the residu…
- Which one of the following is an advantage of using residual income rather than ROI to assess divisional managers?
- Which of the following costs is most appropriately treated as non-controllable by a divisional manager when assessing that manager's perform…
- Which is a recognised disadvantage of using ROI rather than residual income to assess divisional managers?