Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Projecting and valuing cashflows contingent on multiple decrement events

Which statement about dependent and independent decrement rates is correct for a life subject to two causes of decrement?

The dependent rate for a cause is never greater than its independent rate. Competing causes can remove a life before the cause in question acts, so the chance of leaving by that cause in the multiple decrement table is at most the rate in its single-decrement table.

  1. AThe dependent rate for a cause is never greater than the corresponding independent rateCorrect
  2. BThe dependent rate for a cause is always greater than the corresponding independent rate
  3. CThe dependent rates for all causes always sum to less than the independent rates
  4. DThe dependent and independent rates are equal whenever either force is positive
  5. Independent rates sum to the total decrement probability

Explanation

In the multiple decrement table, a life can leave via another cause before the given cause acts, which can only reduce the chance of leaving by this cause. Hence q_j^(τ) <= q_j'. The sum of dependent rates equals the total decrement probability, not the sum of independent rates.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Projecting and valuing cashflows contingent on multiple decrement events shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Projecting and valuing cashflows contingent on multiple decrement events questions